Why does stalin hate trotsky




















He also criticized the new regime for suppressing democracy in the Communist Party and for failing to develop adequate economic planning.

In response, Stalin and his supporters launched a propaganda counterattack against Trotsky. In , he was removed from his post in the war commissariat. One year later, he was expelled from the Politburo and in from the Communist Party. He was received by the government of Turkey and settled on the island of Prinkipo, where he worked on finishing his autobiography and history of the Russian Revolution.

After four years in Turkey, Trotsky lived in France and then Norway and in was granted asylum in Mexico. He survived a machine-gun attack on his home but on August 20, , fell prey to a Spanish Communist, Ramon Mercader, who fatally wounded him with an ice-ax. He died from his wounds the next day. But if you see something that doesn't look right, click here to contact us! He intentionally chose to release it on January 11, , a Saturday, so as to limit its immediate effects on the stock market.

It was on this date that, on behalf of the U. Government, Terry announced On January 11, , Joran van der Sloot, a longtime suspect in the unsolved disappearance of American teen Natalee Holloway in Aruba, pleads guilty to the murder of year-old Stephany Flores, in Lima, Peru.

Flores was killed on May 30, , exactly five years to the day After the Franks were discovered in and sent to concentration camps, The next day, after traveling 2, The working class had been ravaged by three years of civil war.

Many workers who survived the conflict had moved into administrative positions in the Soviet government or relocated to the countryside. Internationally, the USSR stood alone. The proletarian revolution Trotsky had expected to spread and take hold elsewhere had been stymied. The radical Left underwent terrible defeats in in Germany and Hungary.

Benito Mussolini, a former socialist, acquired power in Rome in and his Fascist dictatorship became a fierce enemy of the Bolsheviks. More defeats soon followed in Germany, Estonia, and Bulgaria in After Lenin died in January , the question arose immediately about who would be the next leader of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Trotsky was one of the most recognizable figures associated with the October Revolution—admired, hated, and emulated within and outside the USSR.

A mistake, fateful for all three, though, had already been made. In , Lenin, appreciating his organizational talents, chose Stalin for the position of General Secretary of the Communist Party.

This gave him authority over party membership and appointments. Stalin quickly accrued enormous power and influence in the party over the next few years. Once Lenin, who, in his last months, sorely regretted his choice of Stalin, was no longer in the picture, Stalin sided with Zinoviev and Kamenev in their opposition to Trotsky. As Trotsky later recognized, Stalin took advantage of the situation not only to appoint his own people but also to advance his own ideas about the future of the USSR.

While he had advocated centralization during the Civil War, he had done so out of necessity. Further support came from unexpected quarters. After Stalin maneuvered them out of positions of authority, Kamenev and Zinoviev threw in their lot with Trotsky in This Joint Opposition, never the most robust alliance, did not hold.

Stalin, wielding his power like a club, expelled Trotsky and his followers from the party in late In that book is this remarkable description of Stalin, by then the sole ruler of the Soviet Union. He is gifted with practicality, a strong will, and persistence in carrying out his aims. His political horizon is restricted, his theoretical equipment primitive.

His work of compilation, The Foundations of Leninism, in which he made an attempt to pay tribute to the theoretical traditions of the party, is full of sophomoric errors. His ignorance of foreign languages compels him to follow the political life of other countries at second-hand.

His mind is stubbornly empirical and devoid of creative imagination. To the leading group of the party in the wide circles he was not known at all he always seemed a man destined to play second and third fiddle. And the fact that today he is playing first is not so much a summing up of the man as it is of this transitional period of political backsliding in the country.

With his opponents removed, Stalin enacted the collectivization of agriculture and state-directed industrialization, programs once championed by the Left Opposition, but now brutally implemented with a staggering toll of lives.

Thus, Stalinism, the counterrevolutionary system and ideology Stalin represented, preoccupied him. In this form of totalitarianism, a bureaucracy, a privileged caste, at the top of which Stalin perched like an absolute monarch, lorded it over the working class.

As late as , he thought, however, the Soviet system could be reformed by working through the structures of the Communist Party. The Left Opposition might dislodge Stalin from within without directly challenging state power. Trotsky held to this position until Adolf Hitler became chancellor of Germany in January Germany was a country with a modern urban, industrial society he had long regarded as vital to the prospects for socialism.

The Soviet leadership had tied the hands of the German Communist Party and hindered a united front against the Nazi Party by construing moderate socialists as the real threat. After Hitler took power, Trotsky concluded that reform of the Stalin regime had to be abandoned.

Ousting Stalin by working through the channels of the Communist Party was no longer possible. This much more radical perspective culminated in his The Revolution Betrayed. Proletarian revolt would have to topple Stalin and the bureaucracy. This revolution, Trotsky made clear, would resemble the European upheavals of and more than the October Revolution.

It would be a political revolution, not a social one. Collective ownership and control of the means of production e. Still, much could be salvaged from the damage done by Stalinism. He called for free elections, freedom of criticism, and freedom of the press.

While the Communist Party would benefit most from this open atmosphere, it would no longer possess a monopoly on power. As long as political parties did not try to restore capitalism, they could operate, recruit, and compete for power. Trotsky imagined a restored involvement of workers in economic policy.

Science and the arts might flourish once more. Credit: Gunther Schenk. The girl from Nikolaev was known as Mrs. Bronstein, the Parisian as Mrs. Trotsky, and neither seemed to complain. After the II Congress in Trotsky was for a time associated with the Mensheviks, but in he developed an independent doctrinal line and between revolutions belonged to neither the Bolshevik nor the Menshevik wing.

In he won renown for his brief chairmanship of the St. Petersburg Soviet of Workers' Deputies. During the next few years he tried to reunite the Party and for that reason refrained form trying to build a faction of his own.

None of the other groups found this pose to its taste. During the years just before World War I Trotsky's anti-factionalist stand became in effect an anti-Leninist one. After the war began he went to New York, and it was from there that he traveled to Russia in the spring of During the summer he joined the Bolshevik Party, although he clearly implied that his only reason for doing so was that the party had belatedly adopted the analysis and tactical line which he had espoused all along.

His ability and his logic did not always endear him to his comrades, but his oratorical and practical gifts did win him broad popularity among the urban workers and soldiers in late and during the Civil War.

As war commissar he clashed with Stalin, who ensconced himself at Tsaritsyn with some of his old friends from Caucasus days and flouted Trotsky's authority. However, Stalin was as yet no adversary in the field of theory and policy, which Trotsky considered fundamental. As the triumvirate took form, Trotsky was plainly the most important figure outside it. But no one regarded Stalin as the most eminent of the three. Zinoviev, especially, had an international prestige which Stalin lacked, while both Kamenev and he were regarded as theorists in a way Stalin was not--and a Communist leader had to be a theorist.

As the struggle developed between Trotsky and the triumvirs, Stalin counted less on his own influence than on Trotsky's vulnerability. He did not at first try to turn the struggle into a personal contest. An eye witness has told the story of how Zinoviev and Kamenev would snub Trotsky in Politburo meetings, while Stalin would greet him warmly. On the eve of Lenin's death, the Thirteenth Party Conference published, on Stalin's motion, the decision empowering the Central Committee to expel Party members for factionalism.

At the moment the leader died a new sanctity enveloped his every word and deed, including this decision, in which Lenin had taken part.

Simultaneously the triumvirs decreed a new recruiting campaign, nominally with a view to strengthening the actual worker element in Party ranks. Actually Stalin, as general secretary, was able to bolster his own influence by guiding the Party machinery in selecting new members.

In a few short weeks nearly a quarter of a million men and women were admitted in the new "Lenin enrollment. At the time of the XIII Party Congress in May , the economic situation was improving sufficiently to enable the triumvirs to call their critics to account.

Zinoviev openly attacked Trotsky and demanded that he retract his "errors. Trotsky replied to Zinoviev with a cri de coeur which went to the root of his whole position, morally requiring him to sit passive in the face of doom:.

The party in the last analysis is always right because the party is the single historic instrument given to the proletariat for the solution of its fundamental problems. I have already said that in front of one's own party nothing could be easier than to say: all my criticisms, my statements, my warnings, my protests--the whole thing was a mere mistake.

I, however, comrades, cannot say that, because I do not think it. I know that one must not be right against the party. One can be right only with the party, and through the party, for history has created no other road for the realization of what is right. The Congress was unmoved. It promptly took steps to discipline the Russian Troskyites, as well as dissidents in the other parties of the Comintern. In the autumn of Trotsky published The Lessons of October , in which he distinguished between objectively revolutionary situations and subjective failures of revolutionary leaders in such situations.

As illustrations oft he latter, he cited Zinoviev's and Kamenev's opposition to Lenin's decision to launch an armed uprising in the fall of thus reopening an extremely ugly wound--and he also implied that Zinoviev was largely responsible for the failure of the German Communist revolt of Trotsky restated his old theory of "permanent revolution," with its emphasis on the world leadership of the proletariat and its implicit challenge to the Leninist position on the role of the poor peasantry in building socialism.

Trotsky had made a tactical error. By his emphasis on "October" he opened the way for Zinoviev and Kamenev to retaliate by reminding the Party again of Trotsky's sharp disagreements with Lenin prior to Stalin's caution had reaped its reward. Since he was not directly drawn into this controversy, he was in a position to make public statements in November which in effect forgave Zinoviev and Kamenev for their earlier mistakes--he even acknowledged some of his own--but forcefully recalled to his hearers the fact that Trotsky was, after all, a newcomer in Party ranks.

Meanwhile Stalin unleashed a new weapon, which Trotsky probably had not considered him capable of producing. He set forth a theoretical position of his own from which he could challenge Trotsky. A few months later, in Problems of Leninism, he advanced his theory of "Socialism in one country.

The theory was an innovation and a repudiation of some things which Lenin had said years earlier; but it was a perfectly logical extension of what Lenin had said and done in and later. If the Russian Communists were not to be indefinitely bogged down in the NEP state, they must push on to socialism, even if the world revolution was still further delayed. Authority for such an effort could be found in Lenin.

Like Lenin, Trotsky believed the building of socialism could begin in Russia alone. But what Stalin did was to assert that it could be completed with success and to furnish reasons for his contention.

Russia was an enormous country, rich in natural resources. Provided that "capitalist" intervention was not renewed, the Russian proletariat, drawing on Russia's great potential wealth and protected by its vast spaces, could accomplish the task. For a time, however, the theory of "socialism in one country" was overshadowed by the acrimonious personal struggle between Trotsky and the two most prominent triumvirs. In January the Central Committee removed Trotsky from the War Commissariat, even though he remained in uneasy possession of a seat on the Politburo.

This was the decisive blow. Although he was still not completely crushed, Trotsky receded to the background. If he had been another kind of man, he might have tried to use the Red Army against his adversaries, but his loyalty to the Party was paramount, and he accepted his deposition without trying to resist. Although Trotsky was defeated, Zinoviev and Kamenev soon discovered that the victory was not theirs.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000